SavageHippie Podcast Episode 15 A – Lena Dunham, Proud Boys and Gay Nazis


Well, the election is less than two months away; David Cole isn’t so confident that Trump is going to win, and his being a citizen of California, his vote REALLY won’t count.  Since I’m in the Midwest, my vote will, and if you think it’s going to anyone but Donald Trump, you’re on crack senior!  I mean, I’m the “Punks for Trump” guy, after all.  Ann Sterzinger, as far as I can tell, would rather have Trump than Clinton, but is too principled to vote for either, which is strange since women typically don’t have principles.

Before you go crying “sexist asshole!”, we actually have a whole discussion about this in the podcast, about how men ultimately have more intellectually stimulating conversations than women, and how the smart women, that is the women that don’t like other women, would rather hang out with the men.  Indeed, I mention how I joined Gavin McInnes’ Proudboys club, a men’s only, pro-West club for people who are Western Chauvinists, but not necessarily White Nationalists – I do have black friends and am :::ding ding ding::: not racist after all.  I also have to give up jerking off for a month, which is tough.  I can exercise, give up certain types of food and drinks, but when I see a 5’3″ Korean babe with wide hips and a big ass, well… I should be trying to have sex with this girl, rather than thinking about her while trying to fill my hand–

Anyway, enough about me and my jerking habits.  We discuss a WHOLE lot of stuff; the concerts Ann and I went to this weekend, the purpose of makeup, how much Ann hates Lena Dunham, our views about libertarians, some of my nauseating and tasteless humor and then the last part is just the most amazing story from David’s revisionist past, in which he went with Ernst Zundel to a supposed Nazi bunker only to discover… I’M NOT TELLING!!!

This is part A.  Part B has more of the same, but the really crazy thing about this episode is neither Ann nor David are DRUNK!!! Coupla tea-totaling pussies is what they are!  Oh sure Ann and David have alcohol related health problems and I should be discouraging them from drinking, but killing your liver and brain cells is FUN!!!

The closing track is “The Diet Has Failed” by Yesticles once again from Jay Best.  And, once again, thanks to Clayton V for his wonderful artwork… just kidding that picture is really us at our first meetup.

Playlist 9/22/2016

Murphy’s Law – Murphy’s Law
Murphy’s Law – Back with a Bong!
Oingo Boingo – Only a Lad
Devo – Now It Can Be Told: Devo at the Palace 12/9/88
Repulsion – Horrified
Killing Joke – Pandemonium
Killing Joke – Absolute Dissent
Monster Magnet – Powertrip
Monster Magnet – God Says No
Gwar – Scumdogs of the Universe
Gwar – Ragnarök
Gwar – America Must Be Destroyed

SavageHippie Podcast Episode 14 B – Menachem’s Razor or Your Questions Answered!


Being part of the big ol’ conspiracy, David Cole takes Menachem’s Razor to several of the questions that we were too big of dicks to answer in Episode 14 A.

After that… well, I know it’s becoming a cliche with us where I keep mentioning how, “we’re the only podcast that does this…” or “if you’ve heard another podcast that takes these things and crams together, let me know…”, but this time, I really can’t think of any podcast that goes from talking about cripples and deformed people from Todd Browning’s 1932 horror classic Freaks to that awesome prank I played where I pushed my disabled friend Scott down a hill to the sound of a woman pissing (oo, hawt!) to turning into a boring PBS style documentary about the Sutra baths.

Yeah, yeah, go on and pretend that you find Ann Sterzinger talking about the Sutra baths OH SO fascinating so you can impress old people and nerds who hang out in libraries.  Yeah, that segment will have you on the edge of your seat, and you’ll be screaming, “my GOD, THIS IS THE MOST FUCKING EXCITING PODCAST I’VE EVER HEARD IN MY LIFE!!!”

The only thing more fascinating than that is when we compare Los Angeles to Taft, CA.

Closing song is “The Diet Has Failed” by Yesticles.


Male + Math = This Report


Special guest post by Jessie Nagy

“That’s just generalizing” – said the general female. Females generally don’t know how to generalize because of the fact that they generally lack higher mathematical skill. Generalizing is a version of mathematics.
Data has disclosed large sex differences of mathematical reasoning ability to occur before age 13 of males excelling.
It’s easy to apply an agenda that states environmental & social factors exclusively, or mostly, explains the data, however, there’s a better answer. The scientific method negates the most classically ideal & politically expedient conclusions, & that is why it is the least popular.
Females have been reported to do well in what is referred to as computational mathematics, males score significantly higher on more abstract mathematics.
In the U.S. differences have been discovered after puberty when the curriculum becomes more abstract.
There’s been another sociological hypothesis to try to discount the science, as usual, that males were just simply better because they had more opportunity to enroll in harder math courses, especially higher level courses, than females, but actually, males are more prone to risk taking & to not be hindered by “math anxiety”.
Data collected over 8 years by the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth, disclosed that sex differences of mathematical reasoning ability of pre-adolescents – before age 13 & before harder courses – with essentially same formal education.
There was much convoluted analysis, but, ultimately, by calling-a-spade-a-spade, males scored higher on mathematical reasoning ability. Sometimes I really do favor some Platonic philosophy that gives the blunt truth instead of the wild-goose-chase of spanning time & expanding formulas to state the obvious that males are more logical. This testing called SMPY at Johns Hopkins University was of a sub-set of already mathematically gifted males & females, but with testing of other f.-m. testing of poor or mediocre mathematical aptitude, there are same patterns. There’s a graph which I can’t reproduce in pictoral format, so physical copies should be gathered to confirm.
Their development during the latter investigation of their testing was discovered to have had mathematical & science reasoning to be persistently different with the sexes. Both math & verbal reasoning abilities of males advanced to better levels than females. It’s well known now that females are more prone to verbosity, however, males can refine verbosity even better, it’s just that males have more of a tendency to incline to “synthetic”, for a lack of a better word, knowledge. There’s the argument: “you would derive better ethics from more in depth, “feminine”/”new agey” lectures.” I highly doubt ancient mysticism that was used as symbols to work with what was available to them at that development to try to make sense of reality was created by women anyway. No, you derive better ethics & more cohesion from “mechanical” logic.
In a related science study to the aforementioned math testing, Benbow & Stanley confirmed that personality traits associated with scientists is, usually, much more frequent by males.
There are environmental & social arguments as hypothesis, but they are just that. What is presented by distractions is that females do more poorly because of being taught less, but actually males are just more prone to enroll themselves in harder math, etc.. It was also reported that males improved on verbal ability, in spite of the fact that females are more prone to enroll in more verbal courses. Environmental & social factors only contribute to sex differences of smaller degrees.
It has been suggested that spatial ability is related to mathematical skill. Spatial ability was discovered to be related to better performance on SAT-M as a whole. The girls likely solved some problems with verbal strategy. Alternatively, mathematically gifted females would require more spacial ability practice than mathematically gifted boys to to do as well on SAT-M.
Spacial ability has concluded a developmental trend – influence by sex hormones, & is perhaps an autosomal gene with reduced penetrance of females.
Another suggestion for the sex differences of spacial ability is that males & females have left & right hemispheres of brains differently lateralized. Experimental & clinical data gives that the left hemisphere is specialized for language processing & the right for spacial processing. It is indicated that males have greater right hemisphere specialization than females. Researchers have investigated the possibility that males are more lateralized than females, might be why there’s sex differences of spacial ability.
Conclusively, there’s specific physiological correlates of extremely high mathematical & verbal reasoning skills.
Precocious boys have been reported to have puberty induced significantly later than precocious females. Genius boys are potentials not necessarily readily apparent. Sex differences of cognition are indicated due to increased levels of testosterone. Consequences of fetal exposure to increase of testosterone have been in fact discovered for precocious youth. You read correctly; testosterone would make one more logical.
Environmental & societal simplifications does not entirely explain the data. It’s a combination of both nature & nurture, with the, repeatedly, nature preceding culture.
Citations: Sex Differences In The Brain (Progress In Brain Research Volume 61) Edited by G.J. De Vries, J.P.C. De Bruin, H.B.M. Uylings & M.A. Corner, pg.: 469, 470, 472, 473, 474, 476, 478, 479,