Savage Hippie Episode 34 – The Swastika Killed the Comedy Star


I was thinking of calling the latest episode of the Savage Hippie podcast “Brokedick Mountain” based upon one of this episode’s conversation pieces, in which I tell Ann about the horrific possibility of a man snapping his boner during sexual intercourse – it’s not THAT common, but it’s certainly possible if a girl is riding you cowboy style, your dick falls out and she lands on it wrong, so there’s more incentive to avoid having sloppy, drunk sex – but then I realized that I just made a JOKE out of something that we VERY BLATANTLY say ISN’T funny.

And bless Ann’s sweet, man loving/anti-misandrist soul, she AGREED that it’s not funny – unlike, say Sharon Osbourne, who laughed uproariously on The Talk at a man getting castrated and have his penis go down the garbage disposal. But doesn’t that make me a hypocrite? I JUST said that broken dicks aren’t funny, and then I go and make a joke about a broken dick utilizing the title from that stupid movie about the fag cowboys, that was directed by some Chink or something? Hint: my use of coarse, insensitive racial language is a teaser for us talking about how the left gets a pass to use this same kind of language because they don’t “mean it”, while people like us allegedly really do. See, you have to know what a comedian, musician or author stands for BEFORE you can enjoy his/her/its work because God forbid you enjoy something by someone who stands for something that you don’t.

Where the fuck was going with this? Oh yeah… while the first half of this episode is about sex, depravity, the godawful Yvette Felarca and broken dicks, the second half revolves around how the left is destroying their flimsy house of cards that they call the entertainment industry by refusing to focus on, ya know, actually entertaining people. Whether it’s Sarah Silverman, Amy Schumer, Patton Oswald or the cast of SNL, these once funny – yes, Amy Schumer had a few zingers under that wide belt of hers – comedians are so paranoid about Trump’s presidency, and in the case of Silverman, actually see swastikas in their sandwiches, that they simply refuse to do anything that doesn’t push their agenda.

The bottom line is that comedy cuts across all lines. I mean, look at us; we’ve had everyone from leftist liberals to Jew-hating neo-Nazis tell us that they find us to be a hoot. Now, what’s more of an accomplishment: playing to your own echo chamber or getting fandom from people who normally would hate yer guts? After all, we all bleed red, right David?

This week’s Sounds of Marshabaloosh features Big Business, the two piece, heavy rock combo consisting of bassist/singer Jared Warren and drummer Cody Willis with their song “Father’s Day” from their latest album, Command Your Weather. At one point, both members joined the Melvins for several albums and tours and then later added a guitarist to their lineup, but now they’re back as a power duo, and boy do they rock! Listen to the song here!

The song at the end is “The Diet Has Failed” by the Yesticles.

Playlist 2/13/2017

Metallica – …And Justice for All
Metallica – Hardwired… to Self-Destruct
The Hidden Hand – Mother * Teacher * Destroyer
The Birthday Party – Live 81-82
Killdozer – Little Baby Buntin’
Killdozer – For Ladies Only
Overkill – Feel the Fire
Fu Manchu – Eatin’ Dust
Fu Manchu – In Search Of…
Place of Skulls – Nailed
The Obsessed – The Church Within
Nile – In the Beginning
Fu Manchu – Daredevil

Savage Hippie Episode 33 – Kathy Shaidle: Get Off the Stage, Hippie!

savage hippie 33 cover.png

This week the Savage Hippie podcast gets even more tokeny (or is it tokenish?) by having Takimag columnist and punk rocker-turned-right wing-political-commentator Kathy Shaidle appear on our show; she’s also a freelancer for other news media outlets and has her own blog, Five Feet of Fury, which she updates regularly. Shaidle is another defector from butthead, average or lower IQ thinking of the punk rock world that ruined scores of thousands of kids worldwide by convincing them that poverty is cool, getting a job sucks and that Western civilization needs to die for no other reason than white people started it, and they like totally suck, man!

Okay, okay, I see your AltRight eyes glazing over – FINE, I should have said (((white))) or huwhite – but, if you’ve been with the Savage Hippies long enough, then you know where we stand on the issues… and YES, Shaidle is a self admitted philo-semite, so don’t expect any JQs. Expect lots of Muslim bashing though.

In addition to all of that, Ann, David, Kathy and I attempt to sound coherent as we discuss the following topics:

– Justin Trudeau’s stupidity
– Trump’s potential (though, I think unlikely) effect on the first amendment
– how bad of an idea going to war with China would be
– some Canadian actors nobody’s ever heard of
– Kathy’s punk rock background
– and, of course, who is the REAL token punk rock right wing gurl; Ann or Kathy.
– a bunch of other shit I forgot
– spitting or swallowing (alcohol and tobacco spittle, you perv!)

Oh, and I do my best to help Kathy Shaidle end up on the Southern Poverty Law Center website, a goal she’s been trying to accomplish since the start of her career.

The band for this week’s installment of Sounds of Marshabaloosh is Premonition 13, the latest band from Scott Weinrich, known to more in the metal and underground rock world as Wino, an ace guitarist who’s been jamming since the late 70s in many a fine bands including the Obsessed, Saint Vitus, Spirit Caravan, the Hidden Hand, his own solo band Wino and the stoner/doom/sludge super group Shrinebuilder; though the Obsessed are currently working on a new one. In Premonition 13, he continues with his fine Sabbath, 70s heavy rock riffing and characteristic melodic shouting on the song “Hard to say”, which you can listen to here!

The song at the end is “The Diet Has Failed” by the Yesticles, and I did the godawful Dead Kennedys/Crass inspired art.

Playlist 2/9/2017

White Zombie – Psycho-Head Blowout
Rainbow – Long Live Rock ‘n’ Roll
Rainbow – Down to Earth
Premonition 13 – 13
Saint Vitus – Lillie: F-65
U2 – Boy
Accept – I’m a Rebel
The Exploited – Let’s Start a War… Said Maggie One Day
The Exploited – Horror Epics
Cactus – Cactus
Cactus – One Way… or Another
Superjoint Ritual – Use Once and Destroy
James Gang – Passin’ Thru

Playlist 2/8/2017

Living Colour – Vivid
Heavy Load – Full Speed at High Level
Uriah Heep – Abominog
The Exploited – Troops of Tomorrow
Superjoint Ritual – A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
Fugazi – End Hits
Alice in Chains – Dirt
Meshuggah – Destroy Erase Improve
Megadeth/MD .45 – The Craving (2004 reissue version)
Vanilla Fudge – Vanilla Fudge
James Gang – Thirds

Savage Hippie Episode 32 – Ground Control to Commander Hatonn


Aren’t leftists the worst? I mean, it’s gone past the point of politics with these people. I bet if you posted a phony event on Facebook saying that lightweight, mainstream conservatives like Milo Yiannopoulos, Ben Shapiro or Gavin McInnes are visiting your local moose lodge, there would be an army of these people ready to burn it down. I could be mistaken, but the majority of the people at the Berkeley riots and now the one that happened in New York this past Thursday were not paid shills, but true believers. I have no evidence that Soros money didn’t go into these riots, but then if someone handed me a few grand to start shit, I REALLY don’t know how much true passion I’d have to just throw bricks at a Starbucks window – I mean, I’m no fan of Starbucks, but I prefer to express this the old fashioned way; by not patronizing them.

Can you imagine what this world would be like if everyone was given carte blanche to physically attack something on the basis that they simply don’t like it? Actually things probably still wouldn’t be so bad because I believe most people would just say, “eh, I don’t like it, but it has a right to exist.” Not the left though! I can imagine what would happen if the Savage Hippies did a spoken engagement at one of these universities; I’m guessing that like me, Ann and David would be flattered that just our presence is enough to cause such a violent reaction in people. But eventually this nonsense gets old because, ya know, in the case of Milo and Gavin, people DID fork over their time – if not their money – to actually be entertained and/or informed for an evening.

Anyway, the trio get together for another evening of shooting the shit. And, FOR ONCE, we don’t talk about Hitler….


We talk about him quite extensively and guess what! He’s not the animal lover you think he is! We also talk about Trump’s Holocaust remembrance statement that got so many Joooz in an uproar – well, mainly two –  Marry Tyler Moore’s recent death, monkeys jerking off, sex, that new judge that Trump picked – Gorbachev or something like that – Ann’s exciting new science fiction novel and some conspiracy oriented shit featuring the mighty Commander Hatonn.

If you’re curious about the video I sent to Ann and David, click here.

The band featured this week is the Cherubs with their song “Fist in the Air.” The Cherubs are actually a quarter of a century old; they were originally signed to Butthole Surfers drummer King Coffey’s label Trance Syndicate and made two albums – Icing and Heroin Man – before leaving for twenty years and then coming back recently and releasing their excellent third studio album 2 Ynfynyty. However the song “Fist in the Air” comes from the double 45 they released after their latest studio album. While typically they play heavy, grungy noise rock in the style of Helmet and Unsane, the a-side of their latest double 7″ single is actually quite poppy and might take you on a mid-90s, alternative rock time warp. Listen to it here!

Next week’s episode will have very special guest Kathy Shaidle, who among other things, wrote for both PJ Media and Taki’s, so now she and Ann can fight about how is the true token, conservative punk rock gurl.

The song at the end is “The Diet Has Failed” by the Yesticles (who else?), and the artwork was done by Clayton V.

How Science & Philosophy Became “Passive Aggressive” & “Pathetic”


Special guest post by Jessie Nagy

The minimal excerpts used in this are from a source that was written in an appeasing , complimenting manner. ‘Brain Sex’ is a book regarding neuro-science & biology in general to establish basics of harder science. What is gathered in summation is that cognition of males as concentration, while females’ diffusive. If you state to the affect of the latter to females, they would generally react with diffusion, only proving the establishment further. I have referenced this source a few times not because it’s the greatest in the field, but because this book is just a good source as an introduction to those stuck on lower levels of social studies, as it tries to diplomatically bring the basics of complexities against the pressure of the influence of such diffusion.

Don’t try to defeat Feminism by addressing on its level. Defeat Feminism by overwhelming it with the technical. When a feminist or related tries to interject, just simply belittle with to the affect: “I don’t deal with that cultural type of stuff, I’m more concerned with science”, & remain as strict as possible with this non-argumentative argument. When the second retort comes back, use to the affect of: “Again, with all due respect, the way the debate is set would just limit the field I’m involved with/ the explanations would take too long & it can’t be explained in just one debate, it takes a process of many days, actually” – using the strategy of implying that they don’t provide well.

Both interpretations – complaining by feminists & the like or by sexual appeal – of the primal masculinity from the female are not progressive. I’m willing to accept a simplistic reduction for a preparation that, yes, historically males have been more aggressive & violent. We had to be because we were wired that way from attempting to provide for & organize societies that had it’s beginnings in chaos. This basic fact is what a vast amount of the even anti-feminists who are still sociologically & politically limited would call “anti-male”, but it’s really just a stern fact. In fact, it’s actually pro-male because it’s giving the blunt truth. Considering that I’m willing to accept this simplistic reduction because you need those basics to expand intricacies, in contrast, are females even willing to try to understand? Of course not. For one case, the ‘Blank Slate’ premise is highly influenced by feminine callousness.

This is an excerpt from that source (not the pictured one): “The brain biases persist & strengthen as children grow up, “seeing” life through that particular filter of the brain which they find easier, & more natural, to use. That bias in girls towards the personal, for instance, shows up in experiments. A group of children was given a rather special sort of sight test. They looked through a contraption raher like a pair of binocular, which showed the left & right eye two different images at the same time. One was of an object, the other of a person. The children had been shown exactly the same images. Boys saw more things, Girls saw more people……………….This male advantage in seeing patterns & abstract relationships – what could be called general strategic rather than detailed tactical thinking – perhaps explains the male dominance of chess, even in a country like the U.S.S.R., where the game is a national sport played by both sexes. An alternative explanation, more acceptable to those who would deny the biological basis of sex differences, is that “women have become so conditioned to the fact of male chess playing superiority that they subconsciously assign themselves lower expectations”; but this is a rather willful rejection of scientific evidence for the sake of maintaining a prejudice…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….Men sometimes become exasperated at a women’s reaction to what they say. They do not realize that women are probably “hearing” much more than what the man himself thinks he is “saying”. Older females have a better memory for names & faces, & a greater sensitivity to other people’s preferences.” Even this preparation of basic confirmations presented with ease & in a lessened way was received with scorn (Just some proof of one of these instances: Search for a recorded debate (more like deflecting by mob-rule than debate): ‘Sex In The Brain: Do Men And Women Think Differently’), therefore, proving that the attempt of civility of science, what females sometimes refer to in fem-speak/barbarism as “being too nice”, will be burdened by female-hood. Females are a burden to the advancement of scientific & philosophical progress, & feminism is just one of those influences of gynocentrism. When this book was initially published – a tool to help females, it was controversial because of the very facts itself that the book communicates that females are “emotionally intelligent” have the “social intuition”, but, really, it’s just that females are petty. Sarcasm: Yeah, females really know how to socialize, as if that’s even a hard skill to learn. They’ll insinuate males so thoughtful in abstractions don’t know how to socialize – “lost”, but what’s actually happening is that those males are already gathering abstract patterns that they already made the estimations & analyzed the results – sometimes wrongfully called “defense mechanisms”, which makes the others wrongfully believe that they are qualified to make a judgement just by that mistaken observation as reliable. Females know how to socialize on the childish level because they are like children themselves.
This tendency that females have to judge tone, body language, expression, etc., makes them better candidates for communicating with, for example, infants, sure, but this is double-sided because it also makes them prone to misinterpretations & making false predictions on the more abstract levels, such as often wrongly thinking that an introduction means there’s nothing more mysterious. I will not type with lessened ease & become victims as those poor scientists who constructed that book did, so I will just bluntly state: womens’ retarded n.l.p. manner of “thinking” combined with their collectivism makes them gullible enough to comprise the majority of voters, then voting for candidates on the basis of stamina, tone, body language, rhetoric, etc.. You can’t discern a leader’s level of testosterone for a nostalgic fetish by a casual observation, but that’s essentially the symbol of what female voters vote on the basis of. That would actually require the accuracy of science instead, science chosen to be explored by males who still have those high amounts of testosterone but would rather chose to be intellectual than actors, but, of course, such males are “sad “beta” males with low t..”

The notion that science, logic, philosophy, detachment, etc., (even as I reuse “etc.” – considered redundant) being “passive aggressive” or “pathetic” is a feminine borne one. A robot can give plain, realistic analysis & the person receiving can react emotionally due to not deriving certain preferences, then becoming angry at the robot. It’s the same thing of females deflecting their inadequacies on masculinity.
Because of female’s burdensome n.l.p. manner of thinking, there are whole industries dedicated to wasteful gynocentric activity, akin to lifestyles of becoming intoxicated with alcohol to speak at a woman’s level. Generations of males so ordained by femininity they’ve become like females, & using deflections towards males who aren’t amused by the theatre & female’s immature sexuality; “ You don’t have enough experience with women.” That’s not even earning lessons, that’s entertainment. Those males who have lots of conquests will conclude similar things about female nature, but from a defensive stance, that the analyzer has in retaliation because they know it to be true.
Feminine borne projections, ranging from “gay”, “can’t get laid”, etc., often not even limited to execution by females, are caused by the fact that females bribe their sexuality to males who are ready to become actors like females, through implicit shaming & other means, which guards the fact that females cause major problems in society, fostering anti-meritocratic feelings by placing higher value on femininity with the expense of implying that science & the like is “beta”, or some un-methodical assumption.