Why Mainstream Liberals, Moderates and Democrats Are the Real Problem

eat_a_dickWith some BernieBro “pulling an A-Team” – my new colloquialism for firing a lot of rounds at no particular target and hitting almost nothing – on Majority House Whip Steve Scalise and the recent outrage surrounding Kathy Griffin and her holding a prop of what looked like Donald Trump’s bloody decapitated head, liberals have been feigning outrage, claiming, “GAWSH, they don’t represent US!!! We may HATE Donald Trump and any politician with an ‘R’ by his or her – actually it’s zhe’s, fascists! – name, but we certainly don’t advocate using violence against them!”

I believe that these people are 100% sincere in their claim, and I also believe that they’re sincere when they say things like “I may not agree with what you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it.” In fact, I have several friends who identify as liberal, leftist and even “left-leaning” who know I voted for Donald Trump and don’t think I’m the antichrist for doing so. We have many fine conversations about a variety of topics from films, music and the arts but, when it comes to politics, many of my liberal or left-leaning friends balk and guffaw at certain claims that I make.

Some of their choice responses include the following:

“Fine, Edwin, if leftism is a mental disorder, than I guess we’re your mentally ill friends!”

“Yeah, SURE, the Democrats JUST want to take your guns! NO WAY are they ACTUALLY concerned about keeping guns away from psychos, unlike your precious Republicans!”

“Come ON, DUDE, you GOTTA at least admit that global warming is real, COME ON!”

“Sure, Edwin, you’re inclusive to ALL people, especially the Muslims, right?”

Now, first of all, as if this point needs to be made in the current year, the concepts of “liberal” and “conservative” are completely meaningless out of context, and furthermore, Democrat and Republican are just the names of parties (if I told you that I love the OLD Democrats, ya know, like George Wallace, you’d probably never talk to me again). When Rory Carroll interviewed me for his piece in The Guardian about conservatives living in Los Angeles, I told him that, like most people, I vote on policies, but because of my beliefs and voting record, I end up on the “conservative” side of the chess board. If you put a gun to my head demanding to know how I label myself, I’d say I’m a basic bitch libertarian (still don’t know if I’m supposed to capitalize that or not) with a wider Overton window than most; this has made my Venn diagram overlap with that of the Alternative Right, which I either am or am not considered a part of by certain people. However the idea of reducing complicated topics – abortion, guns, immigration, foreign policy, taxes, drugs and crime – into binary choices that fall under the categories of “liberal” and “conservative”, “left” and “right” or Democrat and Republican is simply acting as a herd animal OR lacking in critical thinking.

With my liberal friends, I believe it’s the latter, and that is why they are so dangerous.

I honestly feel that, as much as my liberal friends are astute, analytical and rational about their respective interests, hobbies and professions – film, literature, music, engineering, math, etc. – they are completely ignorant to the mechanisms that have been running our world since at least the mid-1960s.

The negative portrayal of Joseph McCarthy after the end of the Cold War and the over the top, cartoony stereotypes surrounding openly right-leaning people have made people afraid to label the left exactly for what it is; Communism. Throw in corporate collusion, and you have Crony Capitalism and Corporatism and have it cross national borders, and you have Globalism, which is nothing more than an attempt by a few elites to enslave the peoples of the world under a totalitarian, one-world government.

On the Savage Hippie podcast, Ann Sterzinger asked me when the “modern, far left version of the Democratic party began.” I told her it started in the 1960s with Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” and his war on poverty, the first real attempt in American history to socially engineer equality of outcome, rather than equality of opportunity.

The quick and basic history of the two major American parties goes something like this:

The Republican party began in 1854 with more or less the intention of disrupting the Southern agricultural economy – largely, but not entirely fed by slavery – by pushing for industrialization with factories that were primarily set in the North and owned by top hat wearing, cigar chomping Capitalists with funny mustaches. And if you think for a second that Abraham Lincoln truly cared about emancipating the slaves for some moral reason, you’ve got another thing coming; he made racial statements that would make David Duke blush, and he blatantly claimed that, if he could keep the union together without freeing a single slave, he would do it. On top of that, after the Civil War, he proposed sending every black person back to Africa. Anyway, after the North obviously won the Civil War, by all intents and purposes, the United States became a libertarian country where people were barely taxed, and some people got really rich off of the new industrialized economy; with very little exceptions, there were almost no social programs on the federal level to help people out, and Americans were forced to sink or swim. Some of the ones who swam got rich, effectively showing the potential of a country which gives its citizens the ability to succeed or to fail. Then, in 1929, the stock market crashed, many lost their life savings and a good amount of people lost their faith in a system where the federal government doesn’t take an active role in helping people. Unfortunately, in the three and half decades since FDR’s election in 1932 and the new deal policies which he instated, what was intended to help get a few people working again and to stimulate the American economy morphed into an attempt to socially engineer the nebulous concept of “equality” (again, I ask: equality of what, exactly? Ability? Opportunity?).

So then, am I calling the Democratic party a Communist or Globalist party? No… not entirely…

Again, as I said earlier, I believe liberals and so called left-leaning people mean well, but unfortunately, their lack of in depth political analysis, and their being quick to jump at anything that stinks of “racism”, “sexism” or any word with “phobia” attached to the end of it will be their, and subsequently everyone’s, downfall.

If the war on poverty worked, why are inner city blacks still disproportionately poor? Did any of these people ask that? Do they even know WHAT questions to ask?

The basic notion among the modern “liberal” left is that, if they see something as “unequal”, the laws must be tweaked to “fix” the inequality; it never simply exists as is. Since women and minorities were under-represented in certain professions, well-meaning politicians instilled affirmative action quotas that were implemented either by consent decree or by making the tests to get into certain professions easier; professions such as firefighting. In 1971, IQ testing was outlawed, so now employers had to come up with less efficient ways of testing if a potential employee would be qualified for work. One of the most egregious example of socially engineering equality in recent years is allowing for blacks to get into universities with 200 less SAT points than whites or Asians. Now, I ask, is that judging a man by the content of his character, rather than the color of his skin?

When experiments, such as instilling race or sex quotas or the pumping of money into inner city schools in hopes of achieving higher academic success in kids who come from single parent homes and don’t care about learning, fail, do you then continue to pump more money into inner city schools? When having the government pay a single mother for every kid she has leads to her having more kids so she can have more free money and continue to depend on the government, do you continue having the government pay her for to have kids? When stricter gun control measures in Democrat-run inner cities fails to solve the problem of gang-related drive-by shootings, while dinky, “homogeneous” (feel free to consider that “code”) have virtually no gun restrictions and ZERO gun violence, do you push for stricter gun control measures?

In all cases, logic would dictate “no.” So why do liberals keep advocating for such policies?

The old Communists attempted to recruit people off the streets to attend secret “community organization” meetings, in which someone lectured his crowd about the evil, oppressive nature of the Capitalist system. People would be fired up when they compared their working class status to that of the well-to-do Wall Street fat cats, CEO’s and company owners, who live off the labor of the people they employ, crying “it’s not fair!!! Oppression!” A few rubes obviously bought it, at least for a while. But somehow that kind of thinking went by the wayside when the average American got married, bought a house, had a couple of kids and lived happily ever after in a nice, clean suburb. Not the most exciting life, but we can’t all be Rockefeller.

So, when the old-guard Communism didn’t work, the nu-Communists or cultural Marxists, decided the struggle wasn’t going to be between the “haves” and the “have nots”, but between the so-called “dominant” culture and those people it allegedly dominates. Traditional gender roles were apparently “oppressive”, so came the feminist and “women’s lib” movement to address the “imbalance”, even though there was never a time when women were barred from entering scientific or STEM fields; they then, and mostly now, simply CHOSE not to. There was a disparity between the white man and the negro, so clearly whitey CAUSED that disparity, and now the negro needed some payback – forget that welfare more than compensated for any “reparations” and with interest to boot. Somehow Hispanics and Asians are never compared with blacks, only white people. And of course, the culture is too “straight”, and homos need more mainstream representation, so you better accept their dildo swinging, assless-chap wearing “pride” events, or you’re a “homophobe”; have straight people ever needed parades to represent that they like pussy?

And unlike old-guard Communism, the recruitment to become an apparatchik in the “struggle for equality”, isn’t done in secret meetings, but in the classrooms of universities and on “comedy” news programs by “social comedians” like Jon Stewart, Jon Oliver, Trevor Noah and Steve Cobert. Students are taught that a “history of slavery”, “racist policing” and an overall “racist system” is the reason blacks can’t get ahead, yet completely neglect that the Japanese were put into internment camps during World War II and came to dominate the tech industry. Students are taught that there is a “rape culture” under a system of “patriarchy”, even though rape used to be punishable by death; so does that mean that, during less “enlightened” times, we DIDN’T have a rape culture? Apparently, in universities, 1 in 4 women will be a victim of rape… or is it 1 in 5 or 1 in 7? How exactly do they define rape? Is it when a woman walks alone in the street, and a guy pulls her into an alley and has his way with her? Is it when a girl gets too drunk, and a guy fondles her neither regions without her knowledge? Is it when two consenting adults have sex, but since the woman was drunk, she couldn’t REALLY have consented? I’ve done the third example many times, so I guess I’m a rapist even though I’ve been drunk as well.

Oh, and apparently our culture was discriminatory towards gays until we “fixed” that with “gay marriage.” And while one would think the “gay-struggle” was won, and leftists would take a rest, think again! The left now wants you to recognize a man who dresses like a woman as “transgendered” rather than as a man who dresses like a woman, which WAS typically called a transvestite. And while it’s still accepted that a man who has is ding-dong chopped off and replaced with a fake vaginal device is a transsexual, I’m “transphobic” if I prefer not to sleep with or date this person, since I prefer to date and sleep with women who were, ya know, born women.

And, to top it off, in true Orwellian fashion, new words have been invented to describe anyone who fits the dominant culture. If you’re a “straight white man”, you’re now “hetero cis normative.” If you believe that there are two sexes – not counting hermaphrodites – you’re “gender binary.” And if you happen to be white, “hetero cis normative” and “gender binary”, you’re of the dominant culture and have some sort of privilege.

I asked someone an honest question; “if I’m dating a girl, and she decides to identify as a man, does that make me defacto gay?”, and she took to offense to it.

The question of why she took offense to what is a perfectly logical and reasonable question brings us back to our main point. She considers herself a liberal or left-leaning person and believes that my question comes from the insensitive point of view of an oppressor towards people who identify as “non-binary.” She means well, but she knows not what she does, and she will undoubtedly in the future be the kind of person who will push to implement more policies favoring people with the delusion of being “non-binary”, rather than what the person would have been called a decade or so ago; cuckoo.

This same person sees a black person get killed by a police officer and doesn’t question for a second WHY it happened. Was the black person committing a crime? Was he or she being rude to a police officer during a stop? Was he or she resisting arrest? The answer is always the same; racial discrimination. Forget that more whites, than blacks are killed by police. Forget that blacks consist of 13% of the population, yet commit more than 50% of the violent crime – mostly to other blacks. Forget any of the unpleasant details. If a white police officer – or white person in general – shoots and kills a black person, it’s ONLY because he or she harbored racial animus. The solution? Impede police from doing their job with needless bureaucracy. The result? More violence and death in the ghetto and more disparity between whites and blacks as whites leave the ghetto.

This same person hears of a case where a woman is raped on a college campus and doesn’t for a second wonder if alcohol was involved, if the person had sex with someone she didn’t like and then regret it later, or in the case of the phony Rolling Stone gang rape article, completely lie about it. The solution? Kick men off of college campuses if women accuse them of rape. The result? Men stop approaching women in college or at bars because they’re afraid that they too will get in trouble with the law.

This same person will worry about remembering proper pronouns; she’ll worry if she “mis-gendered” a person; she’ll concern herself of whether it’s more racist to “see color” or “be colorblind”; and if this person happens to come in the form of a man, he’ll worry if asking a girl on a date will lead to a charge of sexual harassment, or in some cases, rape.

And this person will think he or she is completely and 100% on the “right side of history” and in keeping with the times. He or she, who doesn’t follow politics in any meaningful way, will never question the narrative and simply try to keep in lockstep with it, thinking that things always need to be ” moving forward”, and with all the well-meaning intentions in the world, he or she will drive us all off of a cliff.

Dude, I’m Not Racist, I Have Bl… Aww, Fuck You.

racist_bingoI’m not racist.  No seriously.  When I’m driving, and I get cut off, the first thing I say is, “you fucking asshole, arrghgh, I hope you get colon, lung and skin cancer!!!”.  Then, when I see who the driver is, and he/she/it happens to be black, I go, “yeah, you’re STILL a fucking asshole!!!”  What difference does it make to me what your race is if you cut me off?  As far as I’m concerned, there are assholes in every croooww—-

People on the Alt-Right will read this and say, “what a cuck, trying to appeal to blacks when he knows that blacks hate white people, and he’s a Jew, so he really has an ulterior agenda!”  But the fact is that, in my 32 years of existence, not a single black person has made me feel the intense, virulent hatred that some white people have.  Nope, not a single one.  I’ve had my car stolen twice, and I’m going to assume it was by black people, and I think the people who did it are shit stains on society, and I would have loved to put a slug in their chests, but it wasn’t personal.  They’re just lowlife pieces of human trash.

We’ve come to the point where people on the left are sooo fucking obsessed with race that, in spite the 1964 Civil Rights act, the 1973 affirmative action quotas, the fact that blacks can get into universities with lower SAT scores than whites and Asians and the fact that black crime is never reported by the mainstream media in an honest way, apparently, somewhere deep in the annals of American society lies the deep seeded cancer of racism that, no matter how many provisions are given, will never be expunged.

By most people’s standards, I’m white, and that means I’ve got some sort of “privilege.”  Did I come from a nice, upper middle class background?  Absolutely.  Do I have more opportunities than people who come from the ghettos OR meth infested trailer parks?  Well, duh.  Do American employers consider me over Darnell-Tyrone Jackson III for a mediocre data entry position?  Give me a FUCKING break.

Lauren Southern, the hot, Aryan commentator at Rebel Media posted “white racist bingo” on her FB wall, along with the comment, “:::shrug::: these all seem reasonable to me.”  Why?  Because they ARE.

So now, white people of America, I shall absolve you of all your guilt by explaining each of the bingo squares for the purpose of turning  “Casually Racist Whites Bingo” into “Normal Statements That Make Sense Bingo.”

“I’m not racist I’m 3.837% black”

The idea here, so they say, is that, if you have some black blood in your genetic heritage, you feel you have the right to say anything you want about black people without reserve.  Of course, you ARE part black, but I guess you’re not black ENOUGH to call someone who is MORE black than you a “nigger”… er sorry, I meant “nigga.”

“#alllivesmatter”

First of all, NOT all lives matter.  Does the life of a child molester matter?  What about the life of Charles Manson?  Secondly the idea behind this hashtag is that, in response to #blacklivesmatter, a few well-meaning, but too old to “get it” conservatives responded by saying that we’re ALL in this rat race together.  The #blacklivesmatter protesters responded by saying, “you’re just deflecting from the REAL problem, man!  Blacks are getting killed in the streets by cops, and you don’t see it as a problem!”  Well, it is a problem, and it could easily be solved; just stop committing crimes, and you won’t be hassled by the man, man!  Okay, I get it.  There are cops who like to fuck with people.  But just look at the numbers.  Cops kill more whites than they do blacks.  When cops stopped patrolling in the Baltimore, the murder rate between the black gangs skyrocketed.  Oh, and Milwaukee.  So, to all the #blacklivesmatter activists out there: all lives do not matter, but you can sure try to help your community prove otherwise.

“brings up black on black crime”

I personally don’t care about black on black crime because I don’t live in areas where there is much of it, but maybe black people SHOULD, since little kids get caught in the crossfire, and y’all iz killing off your own people.  Just a thought.

“white people were slaves, too!”

Well, they were.  So, what makes blacks so special in this regard?  The Japanese were tossed into internment during World War II and somehow survived the ordeal and now dominate the tech field, so what’s your problem?

“reverse racism”

Bleh…

“doesn’t ‘see race'”

Oh, I fucking see it!  But, I’m not the one constantly reminding everyone about it 24 hours a day.  ‘sides, how can I not see race when I have a hard-on for Asian women, specifically Korean women?

“i was bullied for being white”

Hmm, let’s see; we allow blacks to take isolated incidents and turn them into national stories, but white kids who live in black neighborhoods are supposed to be “understanding” of why they’re being put through their ordeal.  Fortunately my parents moved out of the predominantly black Southfield, so I never experienced this.

“confederate flag”

Yeah, we took it down from every building, so racism is officially over, right?  No, but seriously, it’s not a racist symbol; people just want to think of it that way, in spite it representing po’ white trash from the South, rather than the slave masters.  But, in our politically correct climate, Dukes of Hazard was cancelled, and amazon.com won’t sell the flag anymore.  And guess what; they’re STILL not happy.  Some guy has now claimed that the “don’t tread on me” flag is racist.  You know what’s not racist?  The swastika.  It’s an Indian peace symbol.  We need to bring it back.

“quotes MLK out of context”

What context should I quote him in?  I personally don’t remember a single line King has said other than “I have a dream”, so if I to quote that, I guess it would be out of context, since I don’t think King had a dream about hunting for gold during the gold rush only to have the western imagery fade away, and reveal itself to be a hologram created by a simulator machine.  So, if he did have this dream, then I suppose I’m quoting him in context.

“slavery is over”

Well, it IS.  So, what’s the problem?  I get it; slavery is over, but apparently subtle forms of discrimination are still going on.  And it won’t stop because we’re guilty… and our children are guilty… and our children’s children are guilty… and they always will be, so stop pretending, you racist.

“brings up affirmative action”

What?  Just out of the blue?  Like while we’re watching a football game?  “Say, Chuck, have you heard about that affirmative action?  I hear it’s the worst!  I hope my children never come down with it!”  Actually, it IS bad, and it’s the reason why standards have gone down.  I mean, if people can’t pass certain exams, but you have to have quotas of those people in certain professions, then I guess you’ll just have to make the tests to get into those professions easier, won’t you?  I mean, if we don’t have an equal distribution of a certain demographic, then clearly we’re discriminating against that demographic.  Oh well, it’s not my house that’s burning down.

“has ‘dreadlocks’ or defends white dreads”

Good call; only gross, smelly people have dreadlocks.

“FREE”

The amount with which certain people want to live in certain parts of the country while other people pay for it.

“i’m not racist, i have black friends”

I’ve never understood why this was such an issue.  If you ARE racist or hold some sort of grudge towards black people, why WOULD you have black friends?  I can give a myriad of reasons, such as “access to crack or hookers”, but I’m not going to because no black person I know has access to those things.  Well, my dreadlock wearing, Zeppelin loving friend Jeff is the guy I did blow with from time to time.

“you’re not helping your cause by being hostile”

I completely disagree with this one.  It’s pretty much been determined that every problem ever has been solved through hostility.  The worse the problem is, the more hostile you need to become.  And drunk.  That always helps.

“so black people can use the n-word but I can’t”

Which “n-word” are we talking about?  Nerd? Nazi? Necropolis? Napoleon?  Sheeyit, nigga, it’s not that I’m afraid of using it; it’s that I’m afraid of using it in front of people who will sock me in the mouth.  Incidentally, I don’t know why blacks would want to use that word since it’s not even a real word, but a phonetic pronunciation of “nigger”, and I don’t know any blacks who go, “Hi, nigger, how are you?”  If there are, let me know!

“i don’t have white privilege, i’m poor”

Dr. Dre, who is worth $500,000,000, is more downtrodden than a poor and starving white person.  He just is; don’t ask why.

“invalidates POC anger”

Still can’t help but think POC stands for “piece of crap.”  I SHOULDN’T think that, but I do.  That’s why I just stick to the colloquial of “black.”

“oh but if there was a white history month it would be racist”

We’ll just honor the accomplishments of white people in other ways; ya know, by using all of the inventions they’ve given to society.  Hey, I often don’t take credit for stuff I do either because, ya know.

“not ALL white people”

Not all white people what?  Watch television?  Listen to Metallica?  Take black dicks up the ass?

“fucking sjws”

Yeah, fuck ’em.  They’re annoying.  They’re the reason why college has been reduced to a joke and why every millennial crybaby, who claims to be part of an oppressed group, needs a “safe space.”

“we’re all one race the human race! uwu”

I SUPPOSE if it eats, breathes, shit, walks on two legs and stands upright it belongs to the human race, but this whole “one race” thing is defined rather loosely.  I really wish I wasn’t part of the same race as, I dunno… you fill in someone who is totally lame, but make sure it isn’t a black person so nobody gets the wrong idea.

“white people are discriminated against, too”

Hey, I want to be part of the NBA, but my 5’7″ height prevents it.  Do YOU want to watch basketball with 6′ high baskets?  Didn’t think so.

“brings up discrimination against Irish people”

So, it’s not enough to mention that white people as a whole don’t deserve to have their history of discrimination recognized.  Now you have to mention that the subjugation of a specific group of whites all of a sudden doesn’t count?  Is that because of Ann Sterzinger’s shitty dating past?  Well SORRY, but even she realizes that there are good Irish people.  Or maybe she doesn’t.  Goddamn potato scarfing, alcoholic bastards.

“learn to take a joke”

Okay, I get it; if your friend Clarissa runs to you after she had just been gang raped by a group of Chinese Jews (NOT by blacks, you racist!!!), and you say, “hey, Clarissa, did you hear the joke about the girl named Clarissa who was just gang raped by a group of Chinese Jews?!” and then follow that up with, “what? Learn to take a joke!”, you might be an asshole.  But, in probably most other cases, especially those that aren’t grounded in anything personal, learn to take a joke, faggot.

Now go home and listen to Chuck Berry, Jimi Hendrix, Thin Lizzy, Living Colour, Body Count and Bad Brains at the same time while watching re-runs of Sanford & Son.

 

A Hilarious Exchange with an SJW

soaring_eagle_Indians_Nazi_salute_2I know: I’m a masochist.  If people on the left, mainly SJWs, are r-selected, rather than K-selected, they really can’t help themselves, and it’s pretty useless arguing with them.  But, I try, only to have it shoved back in my face with ad hominem attacks – the biggest, stupidest, most glaring one, of course, is that I’m at the ‘rents house, even though I’ve lived on my own numerous times in the past – and completely irrelevant facts.

My favorite is the one where people say, “yeah, let’s not let in the mud people because they’re trying to take away the land we stole from the Indians.”  Pretty clever, huh?  This person’s logic holds that, even if the “mud people” (his words, not mine) ARE invading, we sorta deserve to be conquered because of what the white man did to the Indians in the past.  Well, sorry homie, but my parents came to the United States in 1974.  Oh, WAIT, they’re immigrants, therefore we need to let in ALL immigrants.  Oh WAIT, my dad was an engineer and my mom was a chemist, and neither of them went on welfare or worked under the table.  And they came here legally.

The conversation I’m going to talk about began with Donald Trump and the Syrian rapefugees, and of course degenerated into name calling.  Lord knows I tried to be civil, but this guy, being an SJW, in order to maintain his views, NEEDED to have me be a right wing caricature in order to maintain his narrative.  He needs me to be a David Duke-esque virgin, who jerks off to anime and lives at home, in order to have moral high ground, because otherwise, his arguments are just too weak.  I created most of this from memory, but I SWEAR it’s as accurate as can be without being too self-aggrandizing.

Me: We shouldn’t let Syrian rapefugees into the country.  Look at what happened to Europe.  It became the rape capital of the Western world after they lett Muslim immigrants in.  I don’t want that happening here.

Him: Well, ya know, Christianity is just as bad because of the Crusades. Okay, I know you, as the reader are thinking, “no way, he’s not that stupid”, but I SWEAR this was actually something he pointed out before smugly saying, “why don’t you read a book.”

Me: You’re a retard (yeah, I called him a retard) for pointing out something that happened more than 700 years ago to justify essentially trying to kill off the West by letting Muslims invade it.  Also you’re inviting rape culture into the country.

Him: Those claims of rape in European countries are completely unsubstantiated – in other words, since they were committed by those saintly brown people, white women deserved it, or are probably lying because “racism” – and 1 in 4 women on college campuses are raped every year.  We have the rape culture.

Me: Is it 1 in 4?  Didn’t they change it to 1 in 5 and then 1 in 7?  Don’t they keep changing the definition of rape so it seems higher because they’re on witch hunt?  Either way, I told a girl at a bar that she has a nice ass.  This is true because she did and she had black hair and tattoos, and looked punky/hipstery, so she was probably a feminist and doesn’t realize how much that compliment will mean to her in 30 years.

Him: Of course you would, you probably have never even touched a girl outside of your mom (now, it’s personal).

Me: Don’t worry about me, man.  I get plenty of pussy.

Him: Huh, people who talk about it don’t get it. (really clever one, isn’t he?)

Me: Oh, actually I’m seeing someone right now, and we went to the Soaring Eagle casino for a weekend of gambling, fucking and pot smoking.

Him: Woa, so rebellious, don’t tell your mom! (why wouldn’t I tell her about that? It was Amanda’s mom who set the whole thing up.)

Me: I just can’t win with you, can I?

Him: No, you’re a basement dwelling, t-shirt making (referring to my wicked cool Punks for Trump shirts) fascist.

Me:

I’m actually starting to like this song; not for the lyrics of course.

SavageHippie Podcast Episode 3 – Interview with a Shitlord

I interview the mighty Matt Forney, who is cogent, lucid and intelligent.  I, of course, come off like a drunken buffoon, whose attempts at humor are met with quizzical silence.

In this ultra-hyper controversial episode we discuss crime in Detroit, Chicago, San Francisco and Portland and the profiling that results

White leftists who vote for Michael Bloomberg in spite his stop and frisk policies.

Where the manosphere, Alternative Right and “Red Pill” came from.

My former fat train hopping crust punk chick friend.

Why discussing sex is less controversial than race.

Mexican government actively encouraging illegal immigration

Hipsters moving to dangerous cities

Flint and its contaminated water.

China’s dog eating day.

Rotherham sex slave scandal and multiculturalism.

Double standards of nationalism for some countries, but not for others.

Apartheid, race realism and society works against reality, elimination of the welfare state, China’s race realism, gentrification as a form of segregation,

neoconservatism, pointlessly discuss Schindler’s List and answer the Jewish question (actually several of them)

How to deal with the Muslim problem

Forney’s sojourn in the Philippines.

We close out with talks about how stupid Gary Johnson, and how libertarianism got derailed and mention Julie Borrowski and Tila Tequila

Opening song: “Assault and Battery” by Hawkwind
Closing song: “Born Annoying” by Helmet

I’m Not an “Ally of Color” or Stop Being a Black Metal Fag

me_black_metalNo matter how many times I’m told to go back to Israel (even though I’m not from there), called a kike, hebie or Jew boy or simply told that I’m not to be trusted by the so called “pure ones” of the Alternative Right, I can’t help but think they’re doing nothing more than peddling the mentality of the early 90s, Norwegian black metal scene.  If you’re not familiar with that, bands like Mayhem, Burzum and Darkthrone were extremely exclusive about who was allowed to participate in their so-called music scene, alternately known as the “black metal inner circle.”  They made their records almost unlistenable to the normal ear by recording everything in as low fidelity manner as possible, and they sang in some of the harshest, screechiest vocals a person can muster before his voice is shot.

And that’s just what these bands sound like.  While one could posit that, like many a fine rock ‘n’ roll band, most black metal bands were out for shock value, then one would have to contend with the fact that Varg Vikernes (a.k.a. Count Grishnackh) was involved with several church burnings and stabbed former Mayhem guitarist, Euronymous, to death, leading to his being sentenced to 21 years in prison; he was released after 15. Faust, the drummer for Emperor, was sentenced to fourteen years in prison for stabbing a homosexual to death; claims vary as to whether it was indeed because he was a homosexual or whether Faust just wanted to kill somebody.

When several other churches started going up in flames, and the graffiti related to the crimes read “hail Satan”, Varg was the first person to slap his forehead in annoyance and proclaim, “ugh, they don’t get it.”  After all, Varg and all of these other Norwegian black metal musicians weren’t Satanists; they were Odinists, and Varg later became a neo-Nazi.  It didn’t matter that churches were going up in flames, the very thing that Varg and the other black metal musicians wanted; it mattered that they were going up in flames for the wrong reason.

Furthermore, around the mid-90s, one could open up numerous metal magazines, such as Pit or Slayer and find interviews with bands who were angry that bands such as Cradle of Filth and Dimmu Borgir were taking on the black metal mantle.  How dare they call themselves black metal?!  They use keyboards!  They have slightly above shitty production!  They sing about vampires!  Girls go to their shows!  Their t-shirts and records are in mall record shops!  I thought Metallica fans were retarded for the vehement hatred they bestowed up on the band when they released their infamous alterna-grunge-rock record Load, but this was just plain ridiculous!

Of course black metal isn’t the only genre upon which the cries of sellout were a common thing; grindcore fans acted no better when they yelled at Napalm Death for going from the grindcore of From Enslavement to Obliteration to the more technical and slightly better produced death metal of Harmony Corruption.

But that’s beside the point.  The point is that the Alternative Right essentially wants a Westernized and white ethnostate.  They complain that Israel is allowed to have an ethnostate, or heck that Japan wouldn’t be too pleased if you started importing a bunch of whites into their country and demographically changing it, yet European populations are being displaced by non-Western foreigners who don’t share their values.  Coincidentally their more “race conscious” views align to a point with non-race conscious Americans that simply don’t want to see the United States turn into a third world country on account of lax immigration policies; ones that have fundamentally changed the demographics of several European countries like Sweden and made them considerably less safe.  For instance, thanks to the influx of immigrants from Muslim countries, Sweden is now the rape capital of the world.

As a result, Donald Trump and his pro-wall building and anti-Muslim rhetoric struck a chord with the Alternative Right.  I agree with building a wall or, at very least, making immigration policies stricter.  I want to preserve the United States’ way of life and not let it become a balkanized third world country.  This means, in effect, that I have interests which align with people on the Alternative Right.  But, there’s just one problem…

I’M A FUCKING JEW!!!

I don’t hide that I’m a Jew because that would be even sneakier, wouldn’t it?  Maybe some of my brethren started Cultural Marxism, but how am I responsible for that?  Milo Yiannopoulos’ and Allum Bokhari’s now legendary (on the right-o-sphere anyway) Breitbart piece functioned in the same way that Kerrang or Metal Hammer metal mags initially reported on black metal.  Regardless of what they said about the Alternative Right – and from the article, it seems only positive – this was not good enough.  Nope, in their estimation, the notion that some press is better than no press is superseded by the fact that Milo is a fag, who gets black dicks up the ass, even though he never once said this in the article and doesn’t try to foist this onto the AltRight.

What the peeps on the AltRight, at websites such as Counter Currents and The Right Stuff, don’t get it is that, once your ideas are out there, anybody can do anything with them.  The original black metal bands, in spite claiming that they only wanted “their own kind” (another parallel with the more “Aryan” members of the AltRight), still had their stuff released on labels like Century Media and Peaceville; meaning that, people who weren’t of the “purest stock” would listen to them and like them.

This is the same thing that’s happening with the Alternative Right.  Websites like Davis Aurini’s Stares at the World or Roosh V’s Return of Kings are not White Nationalist sites.  The former is a Dark Enlightenment site and the latter is a Neomasculine site.  But they share many of the same values with people on the Alternative Right.  According to a  few AltRight people, Roosh can’t be Alternative Right because Roosh is a kabob.  It seems like many people from the AltRight are nothing more than former Stormfront readers; Now, for fucking hell’s sake, do you really, HONESTLY want a “Jew-in-my-sandwich” kook like David Duke associating with the Alternative Right?  That man claims that race realist Jew Eugene Girin, in spite being pro-white, cannot be on the side of whites because of the Talmud.  The fucking Talmud.  I was asked by a former neo-Nazi skinhead once if I hate whites because the Talmud says you’re supposed to treat Goys like animals.  I’VE NEVER READ THE MOTHERFUCKING TALMUD… and I don’t know a single Jew who has.

Thankfully not everyone is like that; RamZPaul appears to be welcoming of Jews as long as those Jews are not anti-white.  Andy Nowicki doesn’t hate Jews; he doesn’t love them either, but nobody’s asking him to.  And me?  I love white culture.  You hear that?  I. Love. White. Culture.  Wanna see how much I love white culture?  That’s me at the renaissance fair celebrating white, European culture.  Of course the P.C. magnates (I know, you’re going to say they’re all Jews) won’t let you call it a White European festival.  Well, perhaps they should?  And again, RamZPaul made the point clear; just because he’s promoting white culture, doesn’t mean he’s denigrating black, Asian or Hispanic culture.  So what’s the big deal?

me_renfest_1

Bottom line is, if you heard the way my parents talked at the dinner table, you would be hard pressed to believe you were listening to the conversation of a Jewish family, a liberal family, that is.  They’re against affirmative action, and they’re for closing the border.  They don’t really condone too much miscegenation.  They feel it’s fine for white Europeans to be proud of their ethnic heritage.  They feel that, if you want to live among your own people, that is perfectly fine.  They have Alternative Right beliefs.

Personally, I’m not as obsessed with race, but I still feel that The Bell Curve holds truisms.  I also have friends who are black, Asian and Hispanic, and I’m not tossing them out of my life any time soon.  If I pointed out to them that it’s not fair for them to get to express pride in their cultures, but for whites to not be allowed to express pride in theirs, they would agree.  But, you know what’s really striking?  I’m doing the job of the AltRight for them.  While Takimag commentors TruthSayer and RacistMcShootface may yell at me and tell me to go back to Israel (where I’m not even from), I’m selling the AltRight to people in a normal way that doesn’t make it seem threatening.  To those guys, I’m just another Jew diluting their message, but to me and many who agree, I’m telling white people that they don’t have to feel guilty of being white.

And the most I can get for my efforts is for a certain Greg Paulson to call me an “ally of color”?  Do I honestly look like anything “of color”?  Do I look more Jewish than Andrew “Weev” Auernheimer, a self-professed neo-Nazi?

To the people like Jared Taylor, Andy Nowicki and RamZPaul, who accept people as long as they share their values, rock on!  To the people at Counter Currents, Trad Youth and The Right Stuff who only see me as an “ally of color”, you’re a bunch of faggot LARPers.  And to the Stormfront transplants, who think that Donald Trump’s election and his pushing of the Overton window to the right, will eventually result in my deportation, keep dreaming. You’re not deporting me, and you’re not deporting Roosh.

And, if you really don’t want me to go to your country clubs or to have a drink with you after an American Renaissance conference, remember this goes both ways.

Stuff Every Woman in a Refrigerator or the “Who Gives a Shit?” Effect

guardsman_of_gorWhen I sit down to watch a movie, especially one directed by Jess Franco, who is known for such sleazy, Eurotrash classics as Vampyros Lesbos and Marquis de Sade’s Justine, the VERY first thing I ask myself is, “DOES THIS PASS THE BECHDEL TEST??!!”

I have to sadly conclude that there is absolutely no way I can find a feminist justification for watching either of these movies, or practically any film I watch.  Unless you count The Captive Female, where the sassy, red-headed hooker uses her feminine wiles to escape from the demented Matthew and his claw hand.

Similarly, when a couple of my buddies and I got out the popcorn and sat down to watch our Saturday night marathon of Birth of a Nation, Triumph of the Will and Jud Suss, I had to admit that it was damn near impossible to find a single egalitarian messages in any of these films.  Don’t get me wrong; D.W. Griffith’s film is a masterpiece in early film making, while the feminist side of me wants to revere Leni Riefenstahl —

Okay, if you’re a modestly cultured person, you got what I was doing; I was trying to apply modern day, Social Justice Warrior critiques to movies that are completely devoid of any value we would find acceptable in our modern, politically correct world.  OBVIOUSLY you wouldn’t look for egalitarian messages in Birth of a Nation – that’s the 1915 film where the KKK are the good guys and lynch a black man, who is played by a white man, after he attempts to rape Lillian Gish – or in Triumph of the Will, which is Riefenstahl’s filmed account of the Nuremberg rally or Jud Suss, a nasty anti-Jew propaganda film from Veit Harlan, who, after the fall of the Reich, went on to direct the anti-gay film, The Third Sex.  Nor would you attempt to see if anything by that Spanish pervert Jess Franco passes the Bechdel Test.  I was using hyperbole to make what should be a pretty obvious point.

And what point is that you ask?

Hold your horses, and this will all make sense.  I just watched Davis Aurini’s brilliant documentary Immersed in Subversion: Control the Culture, Control the Man, in which Aurini discusses video game “critic” Anita Sarkeesian and her narcissistic attempt to censor speech and control the culture.  In the film, Aurini points out several inconsistencies in Sarkeesian’s attacks on video games.  I am not a gamer; my knowledge of video games stops in the early-mid 90s with Sega Genesis and Super Nintendo, so I haven’t played, nor care to play any of the games he’s talking about.

But, in the video, he debunks her claim that video games are sexist by pointing out that the part where you get to beat the strippers to death and drag their bodies around is only one of many possibilities, or the fact that games that feature wicked hot women in stripper costumes and have double D knockers and perfectly sculpted asses aren’t sexist because the women have parity with men who are sculpted like Greek gods.  I say, “who gives a shit one way or another?”

I don’t care if EVERY video game involves some guy saving some girl from some from of peril.  It’s a goddamn video game for crying out loud!  If people get bored of Big Guns McGillicuddy going around blasting people and saving some “damsel in distress”, then some enterprising developer will come up with some other game that has a different story.  Just the fact that he’s trying to explain why these games are “evenly balanced” is such a futile waste of time in my opinion.

That would be like me trying to explain how the 70s hard rock that I love so much isn’t sexist because, even though the Sweet song “Someone Else Will” has the lyric “if you don’t go down on us, someone else will”, it’s only speaking to a specific person and not to the whole female gender.  I could then use Alice Cooper’s “Only Women Bleed” as an example of a song which shows sympathy for women, but what would be the point?  Who am I trying to convince and for what purpose?

The whole argument reminds of me of some of the fantasy books I read; in Robert E. Howard’s Conan stories, the Shemites all have hooked noses and are only trustworthy when they’ve got something to gain from other races, while the dark skin races are all primitive.  Conan also has the predilection for ravishing/raping women.  H.P. Lovecraft repeatedly talked about his hatred for anyone who wasn’t white.  Edgar Rice Burrough’s John Carter character shoots “savages” at the beginning of A Princess of Mars before being sent to Barsoom and attempting to interact with barbaric, non-white races.  What about Sax Rohmer’s “yellow peril”, Fu Manchu?  Shouldn’t the band Fu Manchu be yelled at for naming themselves after a character who most people would find to be an offensive stereotype of Asians?

I remember even thinking this ten years ago when I sat down with my buddy Nate and asked him why black people in his film class get so damn uptight about Birth of a Nation.  He looked at me like I was being the most insensitive jerk in the world and said, “because some of them are black?”  And I thought, “but they do realize the film was made a century ago and that’s the way people thought back then, right?”  Many soldiers who fought during the Civil War were probably still alive when that film came out, and to them, a lot of what is in that movie holds true. Surely they can’t be that sensitive where they can’t put the film in its proper context?  Geez, I wonder how they’d feel about the sympathetic treatment of the Confederate side in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly!  Trigger warning!

And it got me thinking about how, in 2016, universities are a joke and how it’s impossible to look at a piece of art, literature or music objectively anymore.  Somehow the piece has to be explained through a “minority” or “female” perpsective, or someone has to be criticized for having a view that isn’t in complete accordance with what is politically acceptable today.  We have to watch modern films and make sure they pass the Bechdel test, or we have to bitch about how too many women are being stuffed into refrigerators.

Art is not social justice.  If you’re sick of women being stuffed into refrigerators, then make a story where the women are stuffed into microwaves.  If you’re sick of the “male dominated” comic book, video game or film cultures, then make your own games with your own stories.

One thing I AM grateful for is that 99.9999999% of white power bands suck ding dongs, so I don’t have to pretend to feel guilty listening to them.  Well, except for this one.  Objectively speaking, Hail the New Dawn by Skrewdriver really blows.  Seriously, listen to it!  He sounds like he has a frog in his throat, the production is total shit and the guitars aren’t loud enough!  Hmm, on second thought, it’s actually kinda catchy…

I do enjoy a good Wagner score though, and I like early Disney films, and I enjoy the F.W. Murnau film The Last Laugh, which stars Emil Jannings, who became a Nazi.

So, I say go ahead, put on I Spit on Your Grave, The Bad Bunch or S.S. Hell Camp, watch women get beaten and raped, hear honkies and niggers yelling racial slurs while swinging chains at each or watch some big-bossommed Brunhilda conduct grizzly experiments on hapless victims in a Nazi torture camp, because, of all the things I look for in a movie, social responsibility just isn’t one of them.

Also, to a man, I still have no fuckin’ idea what a “trope” is.  Though I do enjoy troping women when I’m at the bar.

The Heavy Metal White Guilt Blame Game

phil_anselmoI was never an Anthrax fan.  Lord knows I’ve tried to like ’em because they sing about Judge Dredd and they had Mort Drucker from Mad magazine illustrate the back cover for their 1988 LP State of Euphoria.  But now I’m done with it.  Bald, goatee wearing, Jewish guitarist Scott Ian pretty much took the cake with his stupidity.  No, I’m not talking about how he’s a Bernie Sanders supporter “In spite how it’s throwing my vote away.”  I’m talking about his recent comment where he feels that former Pantera singer and fellow baldy Phil Anselmo should donate to the Simon Weisenthal Center to show he’s “sincerely sorry” (the article primarily features quotes from another goatee wearing baldy, guitarist Kerry King of Slayer, but Ian’s pathetic comments are at the end) for shouting “white power” and doing a Hitler salute at the end of the set at the latest Dimebash performance.

Now, in my humble opinion, doing a Hitler salute completely out of context in front of people you don’t know, many of whom may be of a darker skin tone, is a pretty boneheaded move.  Nobody is going to dispute that.  But, when you release a video such as the one below, where you’re practically groveling in the dirt and one step above kissing the boot of a black man in prison who is shouting, “who’s your daddy?” before bending you over as you shout “I deserve this!  I fucking deserve this!”, I think the matter should be completely forgotten.  I dunno, you be the judge:

Now, before I go on and continue to make my point about how stupid Scott Ian’s comments were, just take a look at this video.

Real great, huh?  Anthrax, the good time, non-serious, always smiling, party thrash band, shows that they’re ahead of the curve, they’re beyond mere political correctness, they’re so against racism, they’ll do a crossover music video with a notoriously racist and anti-semitic rap group called Public Enemy.  What’s that you say?  Public Enemy isn’t racist or anti-semitic; only Professor Griff is and they duly kicked him out?  Well, then why in the fucking hell is PE’s main man Chuck D singing “Farrakhan’s a prophet and I think you ought to listen to/What he can say to you, what you wanna do is follow for now”?  And yes, we’re talking Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Black Nationalist hate group, the Nation of Islam, who have nary a nice thing to say about white people and especially Jewish people.

Only the leftest of leftists will contest that it’s not a double standard that, if a white band were to sing “David Duke’s a prophet and I think you ought to listen to/What he can say to you, what you wanna do is follow for now”, that white band would look like this:

Catchy tune, eh?  Eh, not really.  I know some people who like this band in spite what they sing about, but I think they’re pretty lousy.  That’s not the point though.  The point is that, without a doubt, there’s a double standard, where someone like Ice Cube can get away with singing “Or your little chop suey ass’ll be a target of the nationwide boycott/Juice with the people, that’s what the boy got/So pay respect to the black fist/or we’ll burn your store, right down to a crisp” or Beyonce can perform at the Superbowl with women dressed like Black Panthers and only a few inquisitive pundits will ask,”but why is one okay and not the other?”

So, that brings us back to Scott Ian and metal in general.  Either Scott Ian is ignorant of who Louis Farrakhan is or he felt that, for a black group, it’s perfectly acceptable to praise anti-white bigots because like the system’s all rigged against them and shit.  Underground music has been getting lefter and lefter.  Whereas punk rock in the 70s and 80s had a few leftist bands that yelled the loudest and were the most popular (actually that’s not entirely true.  The Ramones, Black Flag and Minor Threat are apolitical for the most part, but the Clash introduced Marxist concepts into punk, Crass introduced “anarchism” and the Dead Kennedys were the Jon Stewarts of punk), leftist influence has pretty much dominated the genre in varying degrees, and, since many a punk people now want to enter the field of metal and spread messages of “Social Justice”, the metal scene has also been progressively moving into the realm of political correctness.

I’m a music fan, so I really don’t have the whole Metalgate beef with a band like Cattle Decapitation singing their pro-vegan screed, especially when you can’t even really understand what they’re saying.  What I DO have a problem with is someone like Scott Ian becoming the arbiter of morality and trying to guilt trip Phil Anselmo even more than Anselmo has guilt tripped himself.  For the record, I’m not a Pantera fan as their brand of “groove thrash” and Anselmo’s tough guy, Henry Rollins-esque delivery never really appealed to me, but I respect Anselmo a WHOLE heck of a lot for launching the Housecore label and signing weirdo bands like Author & Punisher and Child Bite, for bringing completely non-commercial underground bands like Neurosis, Morbid Angel and Anal Cunt on tour with them so they could play in front of tens of thousands of people and for spending his hard earned cash on the Housecore music and film festival, giving wider exposure to underground artists and bands.  For crying out loud, he got Goblin, the Italian prog band who did the soundtracks for Suspiria and Dawn of the Dead, into North America!  He should be given some sort of award for that alone!

Now look, I’m no psychic, so I can’t get into Phil Anselmo’s brain and see if he’s truly sorry or if he’s truly “racist” and I really don’t think it matters.  The fact is, he clearly doesn’t want to destroy what he’s worked for for nearly three decades, because, if he did, there IS a fringe industry of white power labels like Resistance who would LOVE to have an endorsement from someone as well known as Phil Anselmo.  The point is that we’ve come so far down this path, that we forget that Tommy Lee went to jail for beating his wife, Ozzy Osbourne the same, that Vince Neill drove drunk and murdered Razzel, the drummer of Hanoi Rocks, that Gene Simmons has pumped and dumped 4,000+ different women without so much as a thought about how it might affect the young lasses’ psyche, that so many musicians have fathered illegitimate children, overdosed on heroin or spread HIV, yet the only thing that really enrages people is the thought that someone might cross that proverbial line of being a “racist.”  Oh, I guess people were pretty outraged over Garry Glittler’s child porn collection, but, even listening to his music is more acceptable than listening to the first Skrewdriver album, the one that doesn’t have any racist lyrics on it.

Now I’m signing out and going back to listening to Manilla Road, reading my Conan books and heading out for night three of Berserker fest.  Cheers and please watch this video from Some Black Guy where he condemns Anselmo’s actions while also completely disputing the concept of “white privilege” in our society.  Good man!