Savage Hippie Episode 35 -Milo Yiannopoulos Vs. Yvette Felarca: Cage Match

mile_vs_yvette

Pretty clever name, huh? Bound to get us tons of google hits, right? Some guy from the BBC emailed me a few weeks ago with a message that went something like, “cor blimey, chip chip cheerio, thanks for leaving the crown, ya bloody cunt, but I stumbled upon your bloody blog, and I would like to ask you some questions about the AltRight”, and rather than saying, “okay, shoot me some questions”, I said, “you should check out our podcast first.” He responded with, “fine, ya bloody cunt, I din’t wanna talk to a Paki-bashing racist cunt like you anyway.” And so, I blew my chances at stardom.

HOWEVER, in order to rectify the situation, I deliberately named the episode with the sheer intent of getting google hits, so that Nigel or whatever that Limey’s name is who emailed me, would email me back and see JUST HOW important the Savage Hippies really ARE. I mean, we have fuckin’ Milo Yiannopoulos, Yvette Felarca and Jim Goad as guests ON OUR FUCKIN’ SHOW!!! And, though we don’t get the REAL Milo Yiannopoulos, Yvette Felarca and Jim Goad on the show, we get their LIKENESSES instead. This is far more important in many cases. Like, for instance, if you’re a fan of 70s martial arts films, but were sad that Bruce Lee passed away, you were probably satisfied that you had Bruce Li, Bruce Lai and Lee Bruce to take the place of the deceased actor. Similarly OUR show features special guests Filo Yiannopoulos, Yvette Velarca and Chim Goad.

Then we send all three of them packing at about 27 minutes, and Ann decides to record the rest of the show in an underground catacomb. At this point, we discuss everything from my circumcised dick to Sharon Osbourne’s finding it amusing when a man had his severed dick go down a garbage disposal to something else that probably has to do with someone’s dick to how some fat Nazi kid can’t find a gurl to sleep with him, so he has to play with his dick and stalk and dox Ann. David isn’t on this episode, and I’m SURE it’s because he was sticking his dick in something.

Hey, so can we attend CPAC next year, or do the all the guys in suits have dicks up their asses and thus don’t want people who constantly talk about their dicks at their respectable conservative conference? I PROMISE that I’ve NEVER had a dick – black, white OR Asian – up my ass like that Milo fellow, though I have stuck mine in the buttholes of two lovely ladies, to whom I was monogamously pledged to in my mid-20s.

Oh, and SPOILER ALERT: ANN “I DON’T TRUST HIM ON FREE SPEECH, BUT HE’S AT LEAST BETTER THAN HILLARY CLINTON” STERZINGER CONCEDES IN THE LAST FEW MINUTES OF THE EPISODE THAT TRUMP IS A BAD ASS, AND EXPLAINS WHY.

For this week’s Sounds of Marshabaloosh segment we feature Solar Flare recording artists Pigs and their song “Amateur Hour in Dick City”, which not only fits the “dick” theme of this week’s episode, but is from from their second and latest album Wronger, and features guitarist/singer Dave Curran, who also plays bass in the noise-metal band, Unsane, one of my favorite bands of all time. Pigs play a mix of Zeppelin-style heavy rock with a hardcore edge, delivering brutal bloozy and heavy riffs, a killer groove and harsh vocals. Oh, and Curran is a big-time fan of Thomas Sowell, so that gives him about fifty-bajillion points ’round these parts. Check out “Amateur Hour in Dick City” here.

The song at the end is “The Diet Has Failed” by Yesticles, and I did the art, which is why it sucks.

I Was Interviewed By Matt Forney for This AltRight Life at Right On.

I was interviewed for over an hour for Matt Forney’s show This AltRight Life over at RightOn.net.  We talked about our time hanging outside the RNC, including being chased around by SJW zombies and attending Milo’s fab cocktail party, my Punks for Trump t-shirts and the leftist hijacking of punk rawk.  Hopefully you’ll find listening to it as enjoyable as I found doing it.

A Hilarious Exchange with an SJW

soaring_eagle_Indians_Nazi_salute_2I know: I’m a masochist.  If people on the left, mainly SJWs, are r-selected, rather than K-selected, they really can’t help themselves, and it’s pretty useless arguing with them.  But, I try, only to have it shoved back in my face with ad hominem attacks – the biggest, stupidest, most glaring one, of course, is that I’m at the ‘rents house, even though I’ve lived on my own numerous times in the past – and completely irrelevant facts.

My favorite is the one where people say, “yeah, let’s not let in the mud people because they’re trying to take away the land we stole from the Indians.”  Pretty clever, huh?  This person’s logic holds that, even if the “mud people” (his words, not mine) ARE invading, we sorta deserve to be conquered because of what the white man did to the Indians in the past.  Well, sorry homie, but my parents came to the United States in 1974.  Oh, WAIT, they’re immigrants, therefore we need to let in ALL immigrants.  Oh WAIT, my dad was an engineer and my mom was a chemist, and neither of them went on welfare or worked under the table.  And they came here legally.

The conversation I’m going to talk about began with Donald Trump and the Syrian rapefugees, and of course degenerated into name calling.  Lord knows I tried to be civil, but this guy, being an SJW, in order to maintain his views, NEEDED to have me be a right wing caricature in order to maintain his narrative.  He needs me to be a David Duke-esque virgin, who jerks off to anime and lives at home, in order to have moral high ground, because otherwise, his arguments are just too weak.  I created most of this from memory, but I SWEAR it’s as accurate as can be without being too self-aggrandizing.

Me: We shouldn’t let Syrian rapefugees into the country.  Look at what happened to Europe.  It became the rape capital of the Western world after they lett Muslim immigrants in.  I don’t want that happening here.

Him: Well, ya know, Christianity is just as bad because of the Crusades. Okay, I know you, as the reader are thinking, “no way, he’s not that stupid”, but I SWEAR this was actually something he pointed out before smugly saying, “why don’t you read a book.”

Me: You’re a retard (yeah, I called him a retard) for pointing out something that happened more than 700 years ago to justify essentially trying to kill off the West by letting Muslims invade it.  Also you’re inviting rape culture into the country.

Him: Those claims of rape in European countries are completely unsubstantiated – in other words, since they were committed by those saintly brown people, white women deserved it, or are probably lying because “racism” – and 1 in 4 women on college campuses are raped every year.  We have the rape culture.

Me: Is it 1 in 4?  Didn’t they change it to 1 in 5 and then 1 in 7?  Don’t they keep changing the definition of rape so it seems higher because they’re on witch hunt?  Either way, I told a girl at a bar that she has a nice ass.  This is true because she did and she had black hair and tattoos, and looked punky/hipstery, so she was probably a feminist and doesn’t realize how much that compliment will mean to her in 30 years.

Him: Of course you would, you probably have never even touched a girl outside of your mom (now, it’s personal).

Me: Don’t worry about me, man.  I get plenty of pussy.

Him: Huh, people who talk about it don’t get it. (really clever one, isn’t he?)

Me: Oh, actually I’m seeing someone right now, and we went to the Soaring Eagle casino for a weekend of gambling, fucking and pot smoking.

Him: Woa, so rebellious, don’t tell your mom! (why wouldn’t I tell her about that? It was Amanda’s mom who set the whole thing up.)

Me: I just can’t win with you, can I?

Him: No, you’re a basement dwelling, t-shirt making (referring to my wicked cool Punks for Trump shirts) fascist.

Me:

I’m actually starting to like this song; not for the lyrics of course.

Jew Isn’t a Racial Slur or Go Sign the #CreatorGate Petition, You Faa- Jerk!

me_middle_fingersUnless you’ve been sleeping under a rock, you should know by now that we live in a politically correct dystopia, where expressing opinions that don’t fit the cultural narrative will get you in major trouble from the cultural apparatchiks.  What’s the point of erasing the first amendment if some blue haired, feminist harpie is going to record an innocuous conversation between you and your buddy, show it to your boss and get you fired?  Or a mob of hired goons will use violent coercion to stop a speech from happening?  Or a website host will take down your video or blog if they feel it offends too many people?  Unlike other Western countries, where certain words, phrases and ideas can get you thrown into jail, the easily triggered, Social Justice Warriors and leftists of the world are doing the government’s job for it.  No need to waste time writing laws to suppress speech when the fear of losing your job is a good enough “bad idea” deterrent.

Davis Aurini, author of the Stares at the World website, and director of the youtube documentary Immersed in Subversion and other videos, has watched his content get removed for no discernible reason.  You can read about that here.

Others have noticed a pattern in the way in which youtube, twitter and Facebook have been biased towards ideas they don’t like.  Not being one to take it sitting down, Aurini has launched Operation #CreatorGate: Petition for Content Creator’s Bill of Rights.

As you’re all aware, there’s been a major push for Internet censorship in recent months, driven by the bureaucrats within the European Union, and the major information carrying corporations – Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Microsoft.  Nothing is going to censor us – but it’s critical that we resist them every step of the way.

So what are we going to do, sign a petition?

We’re going to sign the right kind of petition.  Operation #CreatorGate not only demands that common carriers of information respect the principles of the first amendment, it ridicules the overly-sensitive Stasi-wannabes who are demanding tyranny for the sake of their feelz.

 

The Content Creator’s Bill of Rights

We, the undersigned, hold that Common Carriers of information must be committed to informational neutrality. Many private companies have achieved financial success through the creative output of the content creators who joined their networks, under the assumption of this neutrality. However, in recent months, we have seen a worrying trend towards content censorship.

We adamantly oppose any and all censorship, whether it be based upon politics, religion, creed, race, or any other metric. We hold that all content should be allowed to succeed or fail based upon its own merits, and as such we demand that Common Carriers embrace the following set of standards to ensure accountability.

  1. Disclosure of Bias: Common Carriers must declare allegiance to a particular political or religious creed, or remain neutral on all matters. A pro-furry forum can remain pro-furry; all others must embrace the principles of free speech and vigorous debate. We reserve the right to use words such as (but not limited to): fag, dago, breeder, porch monkey, douche, pansy, queer, cis-shit, skronk, tranny, pozzed, Jew, feminazi, and niggardly.
  2. Accountability of Employees: Should a dispute arise, employees must identify themselves through a unique Employee ID number. We will no longer accept anonymous or first-name-only help centres; Common Carriers shall not be “safe spaces” for passive-aggressive weaklings to push their agendas.
  3. Penalties for False Flags: At present, the system is rife with manipulation. Videos can be spuriously flagged for any reason, causing great difficulty for the creators. Those who engage in false flagging must have consequences applied to them. A side benefit of this is that accountability terrifies the sort of people who are behind most of these false flags, and the threat of exposure will silence them, saving the Common Carrier money.
  4. Confronting the Complainant: Content creators shall have the right to know which account is making claims against them, and shall have an opportunity to confront their claims; as a side benefit, logical confrontations will often trigger the complainants, silencing them for several months as they check back into the clinic.
  5. Innocent Until Judgement: At present, Content Creators have penalties applied to their accounts based purely upon accusations. Until an accusation has been sustained, we demand the presumption of innocence. Common Carriers shall assume a “yes means yes” form of acceptance upon content upload.
  6. Clear Definition of Standards: All policies shall be explicitly and simply defined. Terms such as “hate speech” and “harassment” have become as meaningless as “healthy body image” and “trans-nigger” and must be eschewed.
  7. Clear Explanation of Verdicts: If flagged content is pulled down, then a public statement explaining what rules it violated—and how—must be provided. If necessary, the Common Carrier shall supply Xanax, Seroquel, or a pacifier to the employee making the announcement, should they suffer from a “nervous disorder.”
  8. Preservation of Anonymity: Common Carriers shall not require that personally identifiable information be made public. Anonymous has a rich tradition in the Western Canon of upsetting those who need upsetting, and we hold that Common Carriers must aid in protecting those voices from exposure to mob violence from blue-haired freaks wearing “problem” glasses.
  9. Transparency: If a voice is silenced, we have the right to know why. If a Term of Service is violated, we have a right to know which one. If a judgment is being made, we have a right to know who made it. And if a radical activist was behind it, we have a right to know whom. We call upon all Common Carriers to be transparent, keeping a public record of all such actions, so that those who help “progress” society can be justly rewarded.

We, the undersigned, understand that for some, the free marketplace of ideas can be as frightening as the free market itself. Their natural incompetence, social maladjustment, hormonal damage, and useless educations make them feel like someone who brought a knife to a gun fight—or in the case of SJWs, an animal dildo. For these gentle souls, soiling their nappies whenever they hear impassioned debate, we suggest a seldom-used feature that has been present on most Common Carriers since 2005…

…the block button.

Go sign the Change.org petition, share it under the #CreatorGate hashtag, and repost/reblog about it on your own channels.

Censorship protects feelings; free speech protects lives.

picard_creator_gate

Super Hot Anti-Feminist Launches #theTriggering

lauren-southern-the-triggering-defend-free-speech

Gorgeous – and yes, it’s absolutely essential to bring attention to how a woman looks before she expresses her opinion about something – Libertarian Commentator and anti-feminist activist Lauren Southern has launched a hilarious and hilariously juvenile movement designed to attack Social Justice Warrior crybabies, who have taken an unprecedented level of control of the dialogue in this and other Western countries.  The movement, set to launch on March 9th and 10th is called #theTriggering, and the concept, from my understanding is pretty simple: to be as offensive as possible in order to drive crybaby SJW’s off the internet or just totally insane as sort of a way to tell them that it’s time for them to stop policing every word that comes out of a person’s mouth, especially if that person happens to be white, straight and male.

And the concept is as beautiful as Lauren Southern’s smile.  Not everyone feels exactly like everyone else – the fact remains kiddies that there are people who don’t like blacks, people who don’t like gays, people who feel the white race is the best race, people who don’t like Muslims and prefer they’d leave that evil death cult before becoming a U.S. citizen, people who don’t like Jews, people who want to see every illegal immigrant kicked out of the U.S., people who want to see our borders shut completely, people who feel women should be in the kitchen making sandwiches and, if we live in a truly democratic society, we acknowledge that, as unpleasant as some views may be, we can’t simply shut people up who have them.

Unfortunately, the only thing SJWs want to do is shut people up.  How DARE you not agree with every single thing they think?  Don’t you realize that blacks were slaves 150 years ago and the residue of that slavery can be felt any time a white person so much as questions the effectiveness of affirmative action?  Don’t you realize women couldn’t vote until 1920 and that, any time you question why women overwhelmingly vote for bigger government, you might as well go back in time and sabotage the suffragette movement?  Don’t you realize that, if you have a view that is not in complete concert with theirs, you’re a sexist, racist, homophobe and, now I guess Islamophobe even though Muslims are about as sexist, racist and homophobic as they get, but we give ’em the pass because… WHY?!

I’m not here to discuss Islam; I do plenty of Muslim bashing in other articles, so I’ll stick to SJWs.  If feminist harpies or BlackLivesMatter activists were just derelicts that yelled at you on the street and people just ignored them, then that would be one thing.  However that is not the case.  The fact of the matter is that these people have turned Universities into a joke; they have forced professors to resign; they think it’s acceptable to take down pictures of historical figures because those figures held beliefs that were common then, but would be considered hateful now.  And the establishment is balking!  In no other time in history would two feminist activists be invited to the U.N. to discuss how to censor any criticism of their bogus attack on the video game industry.  Yet, it happened!

But, there’s a catch to all of this.  There is no safety net or safe space for your beliefs.  In other words, when someone points out that Jews control 61% of the Hollywood studio system and try to drive a narrative, such as with what looks like the absolutely retarded (And yes, I’m judging it even though I haven’t seen it nor plan on it) new movie Race, about 1936 Olympic runner Jackie Owens as some sort of struggle on his part against the prejudice of the Nazis, you have to, at very least, not take it as a personal affront.

free_speech.jpg

PC is the work of the devil… no, not the devil, because then it would make it something kinda cool… it’s actually the work of cultural Marxist engineers, who, after realizing that their Marxist, egalitarian society didn’t work in industrialized countries, where people could buy cool shit, had to invent the notion that there was an oppressor and an oppressed, while completely ignoring the history of the rest of the world.  Then, the government could come in and “equalize” everything, whether it be with affirmative action quotas or forcing the military to lower its standards to allow the weaker gender to participate, all while influencing the media to blame the shortcomings of the so called oppressed groups on straight, white men.

So, here we are in 2016 on the verge of complete social and cultural collapse.  In 1967 American Nazi Party leader George Lincoln Rockwell spoke at UCLA.  Can you fathom that happening in 2016?  To have a David Duke or Tom Metzger speak at a university?  I’m not saying these are people whose views I agree with or espouse; I’m saying, in a truly free society, you let them have a chance to voice their opinions and allow people to decide if they agree with them or not.

Some may argue that we “shitlords” are nothing but overweight, annoying losers who are home on a Friday night, chomping down Dorritoes and wouldn’t be bothering with this nonsense if we had a woman as hot as Lauren Southern to take out.  On one hand, they have a point; pissing people off is a whole heck of a lot of fun, like when I teased the fuck out of these feminists who got all angry about the band Black Pussy last May.  But, there really is a point to this.  Well, for one, I’m not overweight and two, it’s not a Friday night; it’s a Wednesday night and that Jew fag Josh hasn’t contacted me to go to the local sports bar, where we can ogle the girls that have the big booties and wear the black tights.

But, there’s an even bigger point to this: whether your economic views are right, left or center, your social views should always be towards allowing an open dialogue no matter how offensive or “triggering” that dialogue may be.  Political correctness is not just a roadblock for comedians to have fun at the expense of the less fortunate; it’s quite literally the death knell of the ability to discuss actual problems with any sense of honesty, to address the elephant in the room, to tell your fat female friend that the reason men pump and dump her is not because of the color of her hair or the way she laughs, but because she is fat.